Star’s front row seat for sporting history
- Local newspaper week
Criticism of e-mail snoop bid
Friday 9th January 2009, 11:00AM GMT.
New rules forcing internet companies to keep details of every e-mail sent in the UK were today condemned as a waste of money and gross invasion of people’s privacy.
The Government will have to pay between £25 million and £70 million to ensure companies obey the latest European Union directive, which comes into force in March.
Critics are lining up to condemn the plan.
Under the new rules, all internet service providers will have to retain data about e-mails which are sent and received in the UK for a year.
The content of individual e-mails will not be stored by the authorities, but the timing and number of each communication will be registered.
Critics include human rights group Liberty, and a host of computer experts.
Spam
Dr Richard Clayton, a security researcher at the University of Cambridge, said: “There’s going to be a record of every single e-mail which arrived addressed to you and all the e-mails you sent out via your ISP. That of course includes all the spam.
“There are much better things to do to spend our billions on than snooping on everybody in the country just on the off-chance that they’re a criminal.”
The Earl of Northesk, a Conservative peer on the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee, said: “People have to worry about the scale, the virtuality of your life being exposed to round about 500 public authorities.
“Under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, privacy is a fundamental right – it is important to protect the principle of privacy because once you’ve lost it it’s very difficult to recover.”
The Home Office said the data would be useful for combating crime.
A spokesman said: “Implementing the EC Directive will enable UK law enforcement agencies to benefit fully from his torical communications data in increasingly complex criminal and terrorist investigations and will enhance our national security.”
By Carl Jones
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
LIVE traffic updates
Road, rail and airport - latest
Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
Government are destroying the rights of the people.
How long before the future which is revealed in the film “Equilibrium” is realized?
Already T % W council will not allowed single people to roam in the town park.
Next emails are kepted on file.
Telephone lines bugged.
A GPS unit in our cars to monitor where we go.
Report abuse
This makes 1984 seem like Utopia and it’s getting worse everyday.
Cigarette anyone?
Report abuse
strange isn’t it,
CCTV daily snooping, all the Star readers say, don’t worry if you’ve done nothing wrong.
Police use Tasers, Star readers don’t worry they deserve it,
Snooping on email, Star readers wake up and recognise that we have become a police state by stealth.
Hard won civil liberties dating back to Magna Carta are being eroded before our eyes, and the comment is the same, not a problem if you’ve done nothing wrong, now people realise the extent of what has happened, it will be too late.
Report abuse
Isn’t it time we just ignored these EU rules like they do in France, Spain and Germany.
Ever seen a Spanish donkey with a passport?
Ever been in a continental pub with spirit optics?
The DVLC can’t keep up with simple mail, let alone store e-mails for 10 years.
Report abuse
The unfortunate thing is, we have no one in power with the guts to tell the EU – NO. Like we have no one in the Council with the guts to tell the government NO on meaningless targets.
We are all to prepared to our civil liberties taken away in chunks.
Report abuse
John Franklyn – Maybe you should stand for Mp again???
But we all know how that one ended don’t we?
Report abuse
sorry chaps, you have missed the point, the UK asked the EU to make this directive, so not only can the UK snoop on its own citizens, but can ask other states to do so as well.
Report abuse
it is time we had a vote, time we got out, time we brits had a life, sorry can i call us brits?. love trading with eu, cannot stand unnecessary rule and regulations, i want the british to be governed by the british, if this makes me a rabid right winger, i plead guilty on this occasion.
Report abuse
Y mab – i’ve never stood for MP, so just how did it end up then?
Report abuse
Devon – If ‘Brits’ is an abbreviation for British then that may be construed as a racist term…. or am I on the wrong post?!
Report abuse
John Franklyn – In the Brookside by election of November 2007 you came 4th with 72 votes!!!
Conservative John Dixon 593 52.0 +21.7
Labour Liz Swift 362 31.7 +3.2
Independent Sudhir Patel 114 10.0 -1.5
Independent John Franklyn 72 6.3 +6.3
Report abuse
civil rights people need to ‘get real’ we are dealing with killers and we need to fight fire with fire, i always think if you have nothing to hide you’ll have no problem with such monitoring and restrictions on civil rights
Report abuse