Eco-farm pair must wait for ruling

Thursday 27th November 2008, 9:00AM GMT.

Janta and Marav Wheelhouse have lived in a caravan on Karuna, their 18-acre site at Picklescott, near Shrewsbury, since moving out of their Bayston Hill house in 2005.A Shropshire couple will have to wait two months to hear if they will be allowed to continue living on their eco-friendly farm.

Janta and Marav Wheelhouse have lived in a caravan on Karuna, their 18-acre site at Picklescott, near Shrewsbury, since moving out of their Bayston Hill house in 2005.

They claim they have to be on site to maintain their land and the thousands of trees they have planted.

But planning officers from Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council have refused permission for them to remain there.

Their appeal has been aired at a four-day public inquiry at Shrewsbury’s Guildhall which finished yesterday.

Ieuen Williams, an agricultural consultant, told the inspector yesterday he could see no reason for the couple having to live on site.

“It’s a hindrance but it’s not essential to live on site,” he said.

“Trees cover 15 per cent of the holding and there is absolutely no need to live on the holding to look after the trees – they look after themselves.

“I appreciate that they have a holistic ethos but no-one has explained to me why the component parts add up to any more than a mixed farming unit.”

Brian Cox, speaking on behalf of Mr and Mrs Wheelhouse, said the couple were hoping to be allowed to remain on site at the moment to continue to run courses for schools and other visitors.

He said they were not asking for permanent planning permission for the site at the moment.

“Janta and Marav are asking for three years’ temporary permission to see if the project can work and get off the ground,” he said.

“The council suggests 18 months if a decision is made to allow them to stay, but three years is essential and anything less than that is unfair.”

Independent planning inspector Claire Sherratt has visited the site and will announce her decision in mid-January.

By Pam Griffin


  1. 1
    Chris

    Crazy hippies.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Rodney Nosnail

    Another example of why green living is not really feasible – it’s not compatible with either national government or local authority plans. Just like wind turbines on your roof, installing wood-burners, etc, the hoops that you have to jump through make it more practicable to live in a normal house and live a conventional lifestyle. As long as green threatens to diminish the tax take by diminishing dependence on taxable services , lip-service is the most that you can expect from national or local government. It seems that the only non-bureaucratic option is to replace your light bulbs with energy-efficient ones – although I’m sure that they’ll find a way to charge you for that as well before long, most likely by classifying burnt-out ones as a hazard and thus imposing a “special disposal” charge to get rid of burnt-out ones.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Council Taxpayer

    What has the 4 day public inquiry cost?
    Who is paying for it?
    Answers:
    Six figures
    Shrewsbury & Atcham Borough Council taxpayers

    A huge waste of public money that could have been put to much much better use.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

LIVE traffic updates

Road, rail and airport - latest Road, rail and airport - latest

Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.