Parents lose school closure fight

Wednesday 19th November 2008, 4:05PM GMT.

Oakland school protestParents campaigning to save their school broke down in tears today as councillors unanimously voted for merger proposals to go ahead – despite a lack of funding to secure the project.

The decision means Oakland and Longmeadow Schools in Bayston Hill, near Shrewsbury, will be combined to create a new school, which could cost about £3 million.

camera_ss4.gifSee our photo gallery here

But at today’s county council cabinet meeting, Ann Hartley, portfolio holder for children and young people’s services, said the £3 million was a “notional” amount.

Oakland chairman of governors Cameron Taylor urged councillors to delay the proposals for moral and financial reasons.

He said: “In our community referendum, nearly 1,000 people voted and 75 per cent voted for the amalgamation to cease.”

But Councillor Hartley said the council had listened to all concerns and the funding was being dealt with. This week, it was revealed education managers failed to secure more than £8 million for the countywide schools merger project – as well as a separate £3 million bid for Bayston Hill.

Mrs Hartley also said Longmeadow was the “silent party” in the proposal and there were two sides to every story.

But Liberal Democrat group leader Peter Phillips, urging members to vote against proposals, said no decision should be made until funding was secured. He said: “You must decide to maintain both schools, which are successful and well regarded by the community and you have no need to close them.”

After the meeting, Oakland parent Elaine Fletcher, one of about 20 who protested outside Shirehall, said: “I’m absolutely gutted. Ann Hartley promised to listen to the views of parents and has not taken anything into consideration.  It is just one big mistake.”

Fellow parent Keeley Caudwell said: “I’m very angry. Nothing we have said has been listened to.” Andrea Broadhurst said: “What they are passing is completely wrong, completely unfair and they have not even got the money.”


  1. 1
    Kath

    So there must be a reason why ‘they’ are insisting on going ahead. A bit of digging may be needed to uncover the real reason. A Freedom of Information request, may be in order.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    diana

    lets all move to LONDON.

    because lets face it close the schools. close the post offices
    the country pubs are now resteraunts
    and the politicians are still raking in the money for them selves

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Janet

    There’s no conspiracy here. The reasons for the amalgamation have been very clearly set out over a long period of time. Just because some people don’t agree with them doesn’t make them good reasons, clearly stated in public.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    julian

    A ‘clearly stated’ reason was to save money. How is spending £3m that you don’t need to spend, saving money? It isn’t.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

LIVE traffic updates

Road, rail and airport - latest Road, rail and airport - latest

Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.