Quantum Of Solace

Friday 31st October 2008, 11:00AM GMT.

Film trailers by www.Filmtrailer.com

Quantum of Solace is a unique entry in the James Bond series in many ways, writes our movie critic Carl Jones.

For starters, it’s the first film with a story which follows on directly from its predecessor.

It’s more brutal, bruising and unforgiving than any 007 movie in history. 

At just one hour 45 minutes, it’s the shortest.

camcorder_ss5.gifIs Carl shaken or stirred by Bond

And without doubt, its ruthless disregard for virtually all the traditions which have earned Ian Fleming’s spy his place in cinema’s hall of fame will divide fans right down the middle.

So, yes, it’s most certainly a memorable affair. 

When Daniel Craig signed up for Her Majesty’s Secret Service in 2005, this is undoubtedly the sort of film he had in mind, full of steely determination, pent-up rage and no-nonsense stuntwork.

But please, Mr Bond, can we have a little more humour to keep the family audience amused?

No-one wants a return to the safari-suited Roger Moore era – that simply wouldn’t wash in the far more cynical and suspicious 21st Century. But if we can’t have Moneypenny or Q, at least flood the screen with iconic Bondian images, drop-dead cool moments, and for the guys, a feeling that “I wish I could be that man”.

Quantum of Solace has no time for such niceties. It’s loud, brash, frenetically edited, and 100-miles-an-hour right from the opening pre-credits sequence, a breathless Aston Martin car chase around the shores of Lake Garda.

Bond is hunting down the mysterious Quantum organisation which he holds responsible for the death of his girlfriend Vesper Lynd at the end of Casino Royale. The trail sends him criss-crossing the world from Haiti, Panama, and Bolivia to Austria, Italy, Russia and London, by twin-engined plane, motorbike and speedboat.

En route, he encounters feisty Camille (Olga Kurylenko) who is on her own mission of revenge, and has an all-too-brief encounter with prim and proper MI6 agent Fields (Gemma Arterton), before sniffing out oily tycoon Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric) who is up to something very below-board in Bolivia.

This is not a James Bond movie. It’s a Daniel Craig action thriller. He carries it from start to Quantum of Solacefinish, and carries it well. As a result, though, apart from Judi Dench who gets a couple of scene-stealing moments as M, the rest of the cast have little room to shine. 

Kurylenko, surely one of the most beautiful Bond girls ever, does her best with a too peripheral part, and what should have been the most iconic scene of the film featuring rising starlet Arterton is tamely wasted.

Many of the production crew from the Jason Bourne series have been enlisted to give Quantum a more uncompromising attitude, and it shows throughout.

Craig launches himself into the stunt scenes with almost frightening determination, including a frenetic chase with hand-held cameras across rooftops and underground in the historic Italian city of Siena. Despite the lean running time, the movie packs in more action than any other 007 adventure.

The 40-year-old star makes no apologies for the fact that Bond has fewer catchy one-liners and is seemingly a more emotional man. 

“It makes for more interesting viewing,” he claims. 

“I’ve genuinely pinched a lot from Ian Fleming, I think his Bond is very psychological, he thinks about things, he’s morally ambiguous, he’s an assassin, he kills people for a living, but he always goes after the bad guys.”

Frenchman Amalric sums up the movie’s attitude: “After Casino Royale, Bond is almost a broken heart, he wants to know why this girl Vesper committed suicide in front of his eyes. Why did she betray him? And now it’s about the good and the bad inside himself, is he an assassin or is he a secret agent?”

Therein, for me, lies the disappointment. We’re not sure. And however bare you strip the formula, if James Bond is to appeal to the mass market audience eagerly awaiting his next assignment, he should always be first and foremost a secret agent.

Otherwise, he becomes just another bloke who kills people.

A licence to kill is all well and good, but without a licence to thrill too, it doesn’t pack the trademark 007 punch. 

Rating: 6/10

  • Have you seen or are you going to see Quantum of Solace? We’d love to know whether you agree with Carl’s opinion. Send your reviews to us through this link.

  1. 1
    Karl Hanmer

    I can’t help wondering that have the people who’ve been complaining about Quantum Of Solace saying it’s not a proper Bond film actually seen Casino Royale? A film lest we forget where a woman that Bond loved so deeply he was prepared to quit Mi6 and elope around the world with, decided to betray him then kill herself before his eyes. If that happened to me I’d be a pretty angry bunny and would also embark on a fist fuelled rage around the world trying to find out who did it. And I only serve coffee for a living!

    Critics are saying that’s all that happens and it has no charm or any of the classic Bond quips but to be fair Bond has more on his mind than trying to figure out something amusing to say when he runs a bad guy over with a carnival float. Quantum is set one hour after Casino Royale ends so everything is pretty raw for him and will continue to be until he finds closure which is what this film is for. And the same goes for the dialogue. People are saying Bond hardly speaks but come on, we know what he’s trying to do here – find out who blackmailed Vesper, we don’t need a running commentary for that.

    We had the classic Connery Bond back and re-invented in Casino Royale which is what we all expect of him. He hasn’t lost that as a character but this movie is taking him to a dark place so for the week or so when he’s carrying out his mission it’s going to get a little bit messy.

    If you accept that Quantum Of Solace isn’t really a sequel as such but just the second part to Casino Royale that wasn’t shown at the time, it makes perfect sense. Once he has avenged Vespers death he’ll get over himself and be ready in his next adventure as the smooth and heartless operator we all love him for!

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Spud

    Went to see the film last night. If the word Bond had not have been on the poster, it was just another action move. The script writers must have forgotten that the whole Bond idea behind Ian Fleming books were the dangers, gadgets, girls and cars. Too which none of these were present in the film. Sorry but an Alfa Romeo chasing and catching an Austin Martin(Please) Every thing is politically correct, none of Fleming’s per-Nash. No real thought gone into it, (Just make a fast buck, typical yank attitude) what ever happened to Q and his gadgets? Miss Money Penny? Understanding the concept of writing a film to follow on from Ian Fleming’s brilliance must be difficult. Please get some one who knows how to write a Bond, the 3 script writers they had are just action movie writers, they should have stayed writing for Acme, or Disney. Tom and Jerry would have been better suited for them

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

LIVE traffic updates

Road, rail and airport - latest Road, rail and airport - latest

Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.