Star’s front row seat for sporting history
- Local newspaper week
We’re allowing the predators to win
Friday 8th August 2008, 6:59PM BST.
I was saddened to read of the two Old Dears (their words, not mine!) forbidden from taking photographs of a deserted children’s paddling pool in their local park, writes blogger Emma Suddaby.
Out for a stroll on a moody sort of a day, they thought the railings around the pool would make a good picture.
So as one of the ladies took aim, a park official, sensing a crime against decency in the offing, rushed out of her hut and informed them that photographing the pool was strictly not allowed.
The puzzled pensioners were left holding the camera, wondering why the rules were being enforced in an empty pool.
Plainly, on this occasion the park official was experiencing an acute attack of Jobsworthitis, leading her to over-react, enforcing a rule clearly meant for sunny days and holidays, when the pool would be full of children.
As we’re all too aware, wherever there’s a gathering of half-dressed, carefree kids there may also be a lurking dirty raincoat, taking grubby photographs . . . or is there?
You see, I dispute the idea that predatory paedophiles lurk in every park and schoolyard.
I’m not saying they don’t exist. Too many young lives are ruined every day to pretend that. But I fear many more innocent childhoods are being damaged by society’s over-reaction to this threat, and banning family photographs in public places is a symptom of this sad trend.
Some of my best childhood memories are of the summer holidays. I’d be through that door in the morning and off into the woods to meet my friends. And I’d roll back home at teatime, tired, played-out and hungry.
Now I know how lucky I was to grow up in the countryside, and I understand times have changed and kids today need to be much more danger-aware, but how much of our fear is real and how much is created in our dark imaginations?
Whatever the cause, the result is that children today are more restricted, more confined than ever before. We clutch them to our sides, restrict them to indoor activities, censor everything they may ever come into contact with and prohibit them from dipping their toes in the waters of life, terrified they might get to learn from a few mistakes along the way.
As a nation we’re good at not succumbing to terrorism. After the Tube bombings of 2005, the citizens of London went out of their way to carry on as normal. They knew instinctively that the minute they started changing their routines because of what had happened – taking the bus perhaps, instead of the Tube – the terrorists had won.
Currently, we’re living by the lowest common denominator in society, instead of aspiring to the highest, and prohibiting honest, decent parents from photographing or filming precious moments with their children just because a minority of depraved adults may abuse this right, just feeds their power over us.
By changing the way we bring up our children for fear of the predators we hear about, lurking on every street corner, we’re limiting their chances to experience life to the full. And what’s more, we’re allowing those predators to win.
- Inspirational Emma Suddaby shares her ” highs, lows – and various murky places inbetween” – with her blog. Emma, a finalist in the 2007 Shropshire Star Woman of the Year competition, was diagnosed with aggressive, destructive rheumatoid arthritis at the age of 22. She later won a dream flying scholarship with the charity Flying Scholarships for the Disabled and now holds a National Private Pilot’s Licence.
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
LIVE traffic updates
Road, rail and airport - latest
Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
No we’re not. We are allowing the media to win. If we believed in every Daily Mail style headline we would never cross our doorsteps.
At least in 2008 we can express ourselves and our fears and share them in a way thats never in our history been previously available. Imagine the unspoken horrors of earlier times, the pain ignored or swept under the carpet. I take it all back. Its the paranoics who are winning.
Report abuse
I Must admit i do not agree with much of what emma has to say in general but on this point she is spot on we in the uk change our way of lives becouse of the minority in this case freaks .
Report abuse
If the Government can keep people afraid, it’s easier for them to bring in new laws to take away more of our freedom and keep us under control.
Face it, we no longer live in a free country.
Report abuse
It is totally ridiculous that that we are filmed an photographed wherever we go, but the minute the man in the street picks up a camera they are pounced upon and treated like criminals.
if you banned photography completely what effect would it have on child abuse? very little considering that most abusers are known to their victims. but the government must been seen to be doing something so go for the most obvious targets…
and what of the park official? were the disciplined in any way? sent on training program to learn their jobs? fired for being an idiot?
Report abuse
If the council bloke is told to enforce those regulations then what can he do. Its not the poor guy’s fault its the people in charge who makes all the board meeting decisions
Report abuse
“Y Mab Darogan” – are you the Park Official- it’s you isn’t it?
Report abuse
i’m sure the council bloke was told to stop people taking pictures of children and not an empty paddling pool…
Report abuse
Exactly Spencer – if your empolyed by someone with a mortgage and a family to keep – and they give you a list of regulations to keep
ie – Ensure people take no pictures of children in a swimming pool.
Then what option do you have but to ensure those regulations are kept or face the sack.
Even if you do not agree ith the reulations.
Surely people should be mocking the council leaders not the poor council attendent who no doubt gets paid just above min wage.
Report abuse
Y Mab Darogan: the point is that there were no children in the swimming pool or anywhere in site. it was deserted.
The pensioners were accosted because they had large, obvious cameras. I bet that not one person with a cameraphone has been accosted in this way and told to leave the area or hand in their cameras.
Report abuse
Marco – if the council official has a regulation to keep too.
Ie no taking photo’s of the pool.
He has to keep to that regulation whether anyone is in the pool or not.
ie in a 30mph road you drive at 30mph regardless of whether anyone else is on the road.
Its the law which you keep to.
The council official was prob not in a position to change the rule hence he had to keep to it whether anyone was in the pool or not.
After all the rule is in place to protect everyone
Report abuse
Y Mab Darogan
How many Nazi officers claimed they were only following orders?
Report abuse
simple – shut down the Daily Mail, its their lies that peddle this doom and panic, just read a proper broadsheet and life will get better for you
Report abuse