Building on flood plains to continue

Wednesday 25th June 2008, 11:50AM BST.

Flooding in Tenbury WellsNew homes in Shropshire will still have to be built on flood plains to meet demand, the author of the official report on last summer’s devastating floods said today.

Sir Michael Pitt said it was inevitable that house-building would continue in high flood risk areas because of a shortage of suitable sites in towns and cities.

camera_ss4.gifThe floods in pictures – click here.

camcorder_ss5.gifVideo – Residents remember floods devastation.In the report, Sir Michael also said that Britain was ill-prepared for last summer’s floods which caused misery on a large scale in Shropshire.

The long-awaited findings of the Government-commissioned independent review come a year on from the flooding which hit vast parts of the country.

People in the county were left homeless by the flooding, bridges were wrecked, roads were closed and sections of the Severn Valley Railway were washed away.

Ludlow and Tenbury Wells were among the worst-hit areas in the region, with Ludlow’s Burway Bridge collapsing into the river.

Residents in Tenbury Wells were left with damage estimated at £10 million.

Sir Michael said: “It would have been very tempting to come out with a blanket recommendation that says no further construction in high risk flood areas.

“I don’t think that would have been realistic, remembering that there is a huge demand for housing and that the Government does intend to build something like three million new homes.”

The report has been welcomed by the Institute of Civil Engineers which uses the example of Ludlow’s Burway Bridge when highlighting improvements needed to protect the country’s infrastructure.

ICE Regional Director for the West Midlands, Steve Feeley, said that when the bridge collapsed “it left a 16-metre wide breach in the road severing gas, water, electricity and BT services”.

He added: “Shropshire County Council and its contract partners handled the situation well, but it shows just how vulnerable our infrastructure network is.


  1. 1
    Big Matty

    “Today’s Government-commissioned report, which contains 92 recommendations on how Britain can be better equipped for dealing with a similar crisis”

    Do any of these recommendations include:
    1. Do not buy houses next to rivers
    2. Educate fools to look carefully at where they buy houses
    3. Educate idiots to take responsibility for being stupid enough to buy houses where they will flood…. and not blame the developers (congratulations to developers for making money from the badly educated)

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    jeff

    why don’t all the lenders refuse to give mortgages to properties build on flood plains as there must be information about as insurers wont insure certain properties because of flooding?

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Phil

    Surely instead of building houses in the countryside – is’nt it about time that brownfield sites in inner city area’s were reclaimed ie Birmingham, Coventry, London etc

    Of course developers are less eager to build new houses in those locations as it seems everyone wants to live in the countryside these days

    These same people fail to realise that the countryside will soon turn into the towns and cities of the future if housing is constantly built on green field sites.

    And the major question is why do we need so much more new housing to be built anyway?

    most families are 2+2 children which does not result in a population boost

    I see very few families made up of 3 to 10 children mainly as nowadays it is hard to afford to keep such big families

    So where is the population boost coming from?

    Could i be the Government current open door policy of letting anyone come into our country.

    If we were as big in size as Australia or the USA it would not be a mjor problem

    But for a very small country it is very hard to sustain such big increases in population

    Housing, hospital facilities, education.

    Surely it is about time that instead of spending huge amounts of money on papers which tell us what we already know on the flooding issues that the government look to controlling the current sham of our immigration system

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Big Matty

    Phil, unfortunately in hideous areas such as Telford a family consists of a Mother and 2+ children. The absent father then continues to spread his seed far and wide. Many figures are thrown about but there is also an estimated 400000 immigrants settling in the UK every year! That’s where the growth and requirement for housing comes from. Its the funding of houses that concerns me, I struggle to pay my mortgage (even though I have a good job!)while others get what they want for free holding the government to ransom on grounds of human rights etc.

    OK, so I’m going off topic now but if people want to live in a place that floods then let them, but don’t make us more intelligent ones pay by means of increased insurance premiums and higher taxes.

    Take Ironbridge as an example, its been flooding regularly for the last 200 years so why should we now spend hundreds of thousands of my hard earned money on stopping this place from flooding?

    What about people building on flood plains? Good work to the developers and I hope it makes them rich while the stupid learn the hard way!

    For the record, I live on top of a hill and this was not an accident…. I just paid attention at school!

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Phil

    Big Matty I agree on many of the points you raised
    but Telford does not have a large amount of single parents – I think that is being slightly unfair to telford.

    You will find the same trend in all towns in the UK.

    Again its down to bad parenting. Bad parents lead to bad children ie All the young yobs thinking they own the streets.

    If the Government cracked down on bad parenting this would solve many of the social issues today.

    By crack down – I do not mean more handouts – tougher fines for parents whose children cause mayhem on the streets etc.

    This may be a bit draconian but people are required to have licences to breed dangerous animals – indeed even licences for guns. Bringing a child up badly with no responsible parental guidance is akin to the 2 examples above.

    As such people should be required to have licences before they attempt to have children – they would be educated in the correct way to bring up a child.

    Failure to obtain this licence would mean that said parents would be unable to claim for child benefits etc

    A bit draconian but thought I would throw it into the melting pot

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    let me have my say

    Its alright saying build homes on flood plains,but with increase in insurance or trying to get insurance is one thing , then there is the cost of the house, people are also struggling to pay a mortgage now, plus the report said about how the homes were built as they were taking ages to dry out once they have been flooded, so if they have to improve the build quality that will cost more.
    Surely other sites can be found.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

LIVE traffic updates

Road, rail and airport - latest Road, rail and airport - latest

Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.