We need to act on data

Tuesday 4th March 2008, 12:01AM GMT.

We are constantly being told by the Government that the fight against terrorism requires the gathering and storage of increasing amounts of information on everyone living in the UK.

The latest announcement concerns our travels – air travel, abroad and within Britain, and road and rail travel abroad (and no doubt rail travel within Britain very soon).

Apparently our Government is going to require us to provide up to 19 pieces of personal information whenever we travel. This will include details of credit cards, personal addresses and mobile phone numbers – the sort of information that is very useful to thieves, including those intent on stealing our identity.

When we remember the recent scandals of essential data being lost (and not yet found), we ought to be thoroughly alarmed at the prospect of being obliged to hand yet more personal information to these same authorities.

Quite apart from the vital issue of our civil liberties, which the Government seems to be intent on removing, this constant intrusion into our lives is very risky, simply because it is so difficult to make such data safe.

We also ought to be worried about the costs of these data collecting projects.

Already, a growing number of councils have passed resolutions opposing the introduction of a nation-wide identity card. Both the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats are refusing to support the ID.

But we need to take action now against all these initiatives, whether it is the ID card or the obligation to provide 19 pieces of information before we can travel.

Dr Linda Edmondson, Shrewsbury


  1. 1
    Kay J

    Would a DNA database stop fly tipping?

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    IAN PAYNE

    Give the Tories half a chance in government and we will all wish for the heady days of New Labour again !!! If we all think BB is watching us now, under the tories BB will be in every part of our lives.

    The Tories may be against ID cards now – but that is just a gimmick, give them the power and boy we will all regret it !!!

    Remember BB in action was invented by Maggie Thatcher’s administration way back in ooohhh – ahh, I remember – 1984 !!!.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    David Burton

    Perhaps if data was made “open source” it would be safer than in the hands of bungling authorities.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Peter

    Almost all of the information referred to has been a pre-requisite for travel for years anyway. It’s essential for travel companies to hold most of this information to help with identification in the event of some horrible accident or other emergency. There’s really no need to be so paranoid about this.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Steve Woods

    Welcome to Stasiland – and please remember to smile: you’re on CCTV!

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    Rupert Barrington-Bl

    i design IT systems for public and private sector.

    Generally the private sector lose more personal data than any public organisation. The difference is the public sector alert the public (to whom they are accountable) of the loss.

    The private sector cover up data loss. It impacts on confidence in the organisation and ultimately it’s profit.

    I am never surprised by the ease with which i can obtain data from private companies, large and small, simply by asking for it.

    A quick Google search on Dr. Edmondson, and gathering the information she has posted about her self. together with information from the academic institutions with which she is associated is sufficient for some, in the know, to commit a fraud.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Ken Adams

    That is an interesting comment Mr Payne do you have anything to back up you claim that the Conservative opposition to ID cards is nothing but a gimmick which will be dropped if they gain power or that a Conservative administration would increase public surveillance?

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    Peter

    Rupert, You’re absolutely right in my experience. Having worked in both public and private-sector IT, when I worked for the public sector, data was always transported securely by in-house staff, or was transmitted via secure, closed, internal networks. Once the private sector got involved, the use of couriers, encrypted data sent over the internet etc. became much more widespread.

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    IAN PAYNE

    Yes Ken it is called living in a democracy, having free speech and realising that what politicians say in opposition never usually becomes reality in government !!!

    Report abuse

  10. 10
    bob

    So Ian it’s just what you think then?

    Report abuse

  11. 11
    Ken Adams

    Thanks Mr Payne, so I read that as you have no evidence at all to back up your claim that the Conservatives will renege on what will be a clear election pledge to disband the ID card scheme. And no evidence to back up your claim that they will increase surveillance on the public.

    As long as we know these bigoted opinionated expressions are based on nothing more than your personal prejudice.

    Report abuse

  12. 12
    IAN PAYNE

    Cynicism at the action and promises of politicians generally would be what I would call it Ken and Bob.

    Being a former member of the Labour Party and now as disillusioned in politics and with politicians as the next person, I am not enamoured with the politicial climate or drum beating of any political party at present. What they promise just turns me off altogether.

    How many manifesto promises did New Labour eventually renege on I wonder ? I wish I had kept them all now and re-read them !!!

    It is part of the historical evolution of political thought everywhere that when one political leader takes a bite at the cherry, the next will find it even harder not to take a larger and more satisfying bite of the same. Or an even better analogy would be ‘when the cat is out of the bag…’ scenario. The cherry and cat in this case of course being ID Cards and the imposition of tighter controls on our civil liberties.

    The erosion of civil liberties and the ID Card issue are debates which are definately ‘…out of the bag’, and will never go back into it – whether we like it or not.

    I just cannot see any administration lessening their grip on individual freedoms willingly or going back to a golden age of yesteryear. I said I was a cynic !!!

    Ideas never stay static, they always develop onto the next stage and governments of all persuasions love control, be it passive or active.

    Gentlemen have you ever read Plato’s ‘THE REPUBLIC’, or Orwell’s 1984, or Orwell’s ‘ANIMAL FARM’ or even Arthur C. Clarke’s ’2001 – A SPACE ODYSSEY’ ? I’m sure there are more examples out there and perhaps somebody could name examples as this very interesting debate continues !!!

    Report abuse

  13. 13
    Ken Adams

    Mr Payne, Thank you for your honest reply I believe you are not alone in your cynicism, most of the people I speak to share your views.

    At some point we will have to reassert our rights over the political class, there is really only one way to do that and that is at the ballot box, we must make our feelings clear to those who stand for election,and not allow ourselves to be fobbed off with meaningless blandishments.If there are enough of us who are willing to use our votes wisely we could place the candidate in the position of either recognising the problem and undertaking to address it, or losing their seats, to whom is not important.

    Report abuse

  14. 14
    IAN PAYNE

    Voting – yes I remember that Ken.

    Mmmmmm, now that was going to be my way of rebelling actually – by not voting !!!!!!

    Report abuse

  15. 15
    Ken Adams

    Unfortunately not voting only brings change for the worse as we have seen, the political parties loose members, people stop voting, then the politicians supposing voter apathy has nothing to with them invent ways to increase voter turnout, the parties start insisting on financial support from the public purse which further insulates them from the power of the vote.

    I can quite understand that there is very little on offer from the main political parties worth voting for, which is why I suggest we try to band together to begin a process of voting against. If we the voters do not extricate the political elites from their comfort zone then the situation will just spiral down out of control. We must all cast ourselves off from any party ties and become floating voters and then we will see if the politicians can swim alongside us because without our votes there is a certainty an individual MP will sink without trace.

    It is time we dislodged our own local MP or Candidate from their party machine and made it absolutely clear to them that it is us the voters who lead this country and under our system the government is the servant of the people, and we will not longer allow that concept to be overturned by political parties creating a self supporting cartel.

    Report abuse

  16. 16
    IAN PAYNE

    Interested to know how we do that Ken !! Whats your plan then on the voting front ? Vote MONSTER RAVING LOONEY PARTY perhaps ?

    Oh, sorry forget that – they are the ones already in power !!!

    Report abuse

  17. 17
    Ken Adams

    I do not have a plan only the germ of an idea, one that I am happy to explore with as many like minded people as possible. Basically the idea is that the only way to pressurise our local MP into doing the right thing is to create a serious threat on their seat, this of course is easier in the marginals, but the more of us prepared to temporally bury our political differences the more will be the seats that fall into that category.

    The only way to threaten a seat is to vote for the second place which ever that might be, whilst at the same time making it clear that our votes can be purchased by a binding promise to rectify the balance between the individual and the state.

    It will mean that all of us will have to hold our noses and place our votes where they will do the greatest damage, thus the smaller parties perhaps even those offering to rectify the problem will be left out in the cold.

    Report abuse

  18. 18
    IAN PAYNE

    So we all vote for what we think is the opposition then ?

    Report abuse

  19. 19
    Ken Adams

    My thoughts are that we all vote for the candidate that offers the best chance of removing a sitting MP MEP or local councillor, for some it will mean voting for Labour to unseat LibDem or Conservative for some Conservative to unseat Labour. In my case it would probably mean voting LibDem to unseat a Conservative.

    It matters not that the person we are voting for has not promised to rectify the problem because we are voting against the sitting MP in order to show them that it is the votes of the people who place and keep them in power, not their parties and their duty is to us the voters to the people of this country, and not to their party.

    It also matters not that the sitting MP has a good record individually on the issue. Because at the same time we continually write to those MPs raising the issue and making it clear that we really do want to roll back the powers of the state V the individual, when they start to realise that they will lose their seats, they will have to put pressure on the leaders of their party for meaningful changes in party policy.

    We do really have a political cartel operating in this country, it is the political parties who set the agenda and with the process of triangulation reaching right across the board, each of them are offering us the voters just about the same set of policies, with only slight variations, which in reality means we do not have much of a choice at an election, but this fact conversely means it matters little to us who is in power in Westminster.

    This is about removing the power of the parties to dictate there terms to us by breaking the link between the MP we elect and the power of party machine.

    Report abuse

  20. 20
    IAN PAYNE

    So we end up with another bunch of coconuts just like the last lot in the end ? That’s what it seems like to me from what you have stated Ken.

    Report abuse

  21. 21
    Ken Adams

    Yes but a bunch of coconuts who have been served a very severe warning that we the people have had enough.

    Report abuse

  22. 22
    John Hazard

    Peter Steve Rupert Ken Ian Kay and Bob. Why don’t you all get together and form your own party and stand for election.

    Reading the correspondence at the end of the ticker tape on 13th March or thereabouts there seems to be little to connect it to Dr. Edmondson’s original letter dated 4th March.

    So clearly you’re all qualified for Westminster and perhaps when you arrive there you could start by introducing legislation that ensures that when sensitive data is lost stolen or strays, heads roll.

    Report abuse

  23. 23
    IAN PAYNE

    Depends whether the coconuts are the ones you are kicking out or voting in Ken !!!

    Report abuse

  24. 24
    IAN PAYNE

    What a good idea John – would you be our spin doctor ?

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.