No prison for badger hunter
Thursday 4th October 2007, 12:11PM BST.
A Telford man was today given a suspended prison sentence for hunting badgers.Father-of-five Mark Paddock, 37, of Aintree Close, Leegomery, denied “lamping” badgers – hunting them with a strong light – between January 2005 and March 13 last year.
But after a trial at Telford Magistrates Court, District Judge Nicolas Cartwright yesterday found him guilty and said evidence against him was overwhelming.
Today the district judge said he was suspending the 90-day prison sentence for two years – only because Paddock had sole custody of three children.
He will also be subject to a 90-day curfew between 8pm and 5.30am, will have to do 200 hours unpaid work and pay £2,600 towards the £26,000 legal costs.
The trial heard Paddock admitted killing a badger by sticking a knife into its throat. He maintained he had to use the knife on the badger because his lurcher dogs attacked it and left it seriously injured.
The judge dismissed a suggestion by defence counsel Clive Rees that Paddock had recklessly rather than deliberately hunted the badger.
The judge said on the video clips found on Paddock’s mobile phone, he had made no physical effort to pull off or restrain his dogs after the attack.
By Lisa Rowley
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
LIVE traffic updates
Road, rail and airport - latest
Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
This cretin should have gone to prison for 12 months, what does one have to do to get imprisonment under this Government these days.
Report abuse
What a sick individual – what possible pleasure could he have got from this?
Report abuse
I read on the BBC news site that he was ordered to pay costs of £26000, but because the Judge said he would not be able to afford the full costs then he would only have to pay £2600 and the RSPCA would have to pay the remainder (£23400).
Ehh! He was found guilty and he should pay – not the RSPCA who rely on donations. What is the Justice system coming to in this country?
Report abuse
Great. Slap on the wrist. Same old same old!
Report abuse
What a nice chap. Hopefully he gets what he deserves-the same treatment he dished out to innocent animals.
Report abuse
It is an absolute disgrace that this man avoided jail, and a slap in the face to the RSPCA to have to pay HIS court costs! Incredible. Mark Paddock is an evil coward.
Report abuse
Should have got 10 years.
Report abuse
This is ridiculous! What sort of punishment is this?
Report abuse
He has custody of 3 children so who was looking after them whilst he murdered the badger. He should have been sent to prison and also he should cover all the court costs not part of them.
Report abuse
All these comments are valid. Just what is it coming to when the RSPCA prosecute a case,win and then have to meet a high % of the costs.
The prisons may be full but there is always room for this…….
Report abuse
Let’s not be too exited about this and put it into perspective – the punishment he got is still more than had he killed somebody by dangerous driving. I think that his punishment was lenient, but let’s not forget there are wider problems with punishments.
Report abuse
This sick hunter (one of many who marched in London to demonstrate against the Hunting Act) can still get his kicks following illegal fox hunts when the foot and mouth scare is over – the Countryside Alliance is supported by thousands of men who include ‘lamping’ as their hobby.
Report abuse