Fake CV man got £150,000
Monday 18th June 2007, 6:52PM BST.
A 56-year-old man today admitted faking his qualifications to obtain more than £150,000 in salary payments from education organisations, including one in Shropshire.
Paul Hallam made up his CV to show academic qualifications he never obtained so he could land a job with Midlands education organisation Top Options.
He also admitted tricking bosses at Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council in a web of lies that lasted over a 16-year period.
It is believed Hallam was first employed by Top Options Ltd in 2001, starting in the company’s headquarters in Warwickshire, before moving to Young Options in Higford, near Shifnal. He worked for the company until November 2004.
Hallam, who was declared bankrupt two years ago and is now working as a hospital porter in Southampton, admitted two counts of obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception today.
At Shrewsbury Crown Court he admitted falsely claiming qualifications to obtain £48,686.27 from Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council between May 1989 and September 1991.
He also admitted falsely creating qualifications to obtain £104,512.72 from Top Options Ltd between January 2001 and October 2005. The organisation, trading as Options Group based in Warwickshire, runs schools, specialist centres and homes in Shropshire.
Judge Robin Onions said people like Hallam, of Hamble, near Southampton, were “pathetic” more than anything else.
He said: “The essence of the employment system is that people who apply for jobs are honest and open.”
Mr Richard Jory, for Hallam, said he had no previous convictions and currently had no assets. He said: “He did carry out the job to a standard where there was no criticism of him.”
Mr Jory said Hallam had obtained a masters in education from Birmingham University.
Judge Onions adjourned the case until July 23 for reports, but warned Hallam he was keeping all options open, including prison. Hallam was released on bail.
By Steve Todd and Kirsty Marston
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
And why are all of his employers not being charged with gross incompetence, in that they were not able to ascertain how ‘qualified’ he was (probably because they themselves are not even that well qualified!)
Once again ratepayers money being squandered by fools who are only interested in keeping their gravy train running.
Report abuse
WHAT EVER NEXT! SOON WE WILL BE READING ABOUT PEOPLE WORKING AS PORTERS IN HOSPITALS, AND BECOMING DOCTORS IN THEIR SPARE TIME BY PRODUCING NOTHING MORE THAN A WHITE COAT.
Report abuse
Why on earth do not employers follow up references BEFORE the offer someone a job?
Then the offence of obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception would be virtually non-existant.
Report abuse
this guy should not have lied etc but from what we hear he did his job well so credit should be given for that, a prison sentance would be far to harsh
Report abuse
Interesting isn’t it, that although he didn’t have these qualifications, he had apparently carried out these responsible jobs to a high standard. I’m not condoning the lies he told – simply making an observation.
Personally, from my own experience, I would rather have someone in a job who had spent years learning in situ, rather than some bushy-tailed graduate who has been set up with unrealistic aspirations that an employer is just waiting to fast-track them to the top jobs.
Report abuse
What made them look into him. Just how many others maybe in the same position in various authorities, but because they are in favour, nothing happens.
Suspicious, yes, just a little.
Report abuse
Surely his employers should be the ones whom should be standing to account, why wasnt he checked out?
He appears to have done a good job, seems he did a better job than his employees!!
Report abuse
Woah hang on…who said he did a good job??
Briefs are very clever, they paint the best picture possible. The best they could come up with here was that there was no criticism of him. Given where he was working, he could have been totally incompetent for years and receive no official criticism.
Report abuse
Sounds like the midlands college principal with the Ph.D that came through the post, or is this just a rumour?
Report abuse