Councillors reject moves to put off Wakeman School decision

Thursday 12th May 2011, 3:11PM BST.

Councillors reject moves to put off Wakeman School decision

Shropshire councillors today rejected moves to defer a decision to close The Wakeman secondary school in Shrewsbury when they met at Shirehall.

Shropshire Council also voted not to allow two primary schools facing closure – Maesbury, near Oswestry, and Stiperstones, near Shrewsbury – extra time to formulate plans to federate with other primaries.

A fresh debate on the future of the three schools was opened up today.

Under council rules, petitions collected by the schools enabled each one up to five minutes to outline their case after which there was a debate on each proposal.

Last week the council cabinet agreed to close the three schools along with the primaries at Hopton Wafers, near Cleobury Mortimer, and Barrow, near Broseley.

The plans have gone forward to a final six-week phase of consultation with the council due to take a final decision on July 20.

Wakeman parent governor Ruth Exelby called for a rethink. She claimed that information presented to cabinet had been “economical with the truth”.

Mrs Exelby said that in six years time a new school, costing more than £30 million, would be needed.

Labour and Lib Dem opposition councillors supported the idea of deferring the closure plan so more research could be carried out relating to the school.

But Councillor Aggie Caesar-Homden moved, and it was agreed, that no action be taken.

Mrs Exelby said she was “absolutely appalled” that the council would not agree to a deferment.

Tony Milner, for Maesbury School, and David Jackson, for Stiperstones, both made strong pleas for extra time to formulate federation plans.


  1. 1
    ANDREW FINCH

    “Shropshire Council also voted not to allow two primary schools facing closure – Maesbury, near Oswestry, and Stiperstones, near Shrewsbury – extra time to formulate plans to federate with other primaries”.
    What excuse do they have for this ??? spin to follow in about 48 hours.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Pete Smith

    If it can’t be done within the statutory 6 weeks what difference would an extra 2 weeks going to make? All they had to say was ‘we are in negotiations with school X to enter a federation agreement’ but it seems they haven’t, other schools managed it within the allotted time so there’s really no excuse, time for them to stop whining on this site and bleating on the local radio, yes, it’s time to extract their digits.

    Report abuse

    • Port Hill Boy

      Totally agree Pete Smith.
      Time the parents/staff/governors whoever put their energies into dealing with the future and making remaining schools as vibrant and succesful as possible.

      Report abuse

      • Helen Fletcher

        So it’s OK for you to put your energy into criticizing those of us affected by the proposed school closures, but it’s not OK for us to put our energy into fighting the closures? In the case of The Wakeman, the school has not been given the fair assessment and consultation required of Shropshire Council. The Council has admitted that if it closes the school, we’ll need another secondary school in Shrewsbury in a few years and yet despite that, the benefits which the school brings to the community, children and environment and even its latest Ofsted have been discounted, and alternative ideas for saving money have been ignored. Given all this, to not even allow extra time to explore whether closing the school is the most sensible way forward smacks of injustice and so of course we will continue to fight.

        Report abuse

        • Port Hill Boy

          “injustice” ??
          You don’t like the decision, you had weeks to come up with alternative proposals, you can’t suggest where the funding might come from so now you bleat “injustice”.

          Report abuse

      • Twiggo

        Pete Smith and Port Hill Boy – you don’t know the facts. Stop your “whining” and “bleating”.

        Report abuse

  3. 3
    Tony

    I must say I have to agree with Pete and Port Hill Boy here, the statutory time limit has been set and seems to have been adhered to, end of argument.
    I heard someone on the radio the other day saying that the council weren’t listening, what they meant to say was that they had spoken to the council and their views were dismissed, that does not mean that they are/were not listening.
    The schools were asked to come up with viable alternatives, they obviously haven’t, again, end of argument.
    I applaud anyone who puts energy into a venture, this however seems to becoming an adventure where the taxpayer (that includes people with no connection to the schools) are asked to provide funds to keep say 10 schools open and fully staffed where there are only enough pupils to fill 9. In any other walk of life we expect efficiency that means 100% not 90%.
    We have other services crying out for funds but there are not enough to go around, that means everyone of them will take a hit somewhere along the line.
    Figures keep being bandied about be they from the council side or the schools, I don’t know who to trust, and one thing’s for certain they never will add up.
    I just wish that the vigilante comments of ‘name and shame’ etc cut no ice with me; I look at the whole picture with both eyes wide open, not with a monopic tunnel view, and shall vote accordingly, that is what democracy is about, your vote may cancel or add to mine.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Phillip Jones

    So what has everybody been doing since this review started, it seems that The Wakeman in particular seems to have put all their money on the one horse to win rather than going for an each-way bet, and as it is has been left in the stalls with no hope of catching up let alone winning.I have read so many people complaining about why some councillors i.e. outsiders, have had a vote on things that do not affect their own particular district, could the same not be said of parliament where an MP in Yorkshire gets to vote on matters affecting Shropshire?I can already see in my minds eye the signs as I approach the county town>>>> Shrewsbury twinned with Royston Vasey, a local council for local decisions :-)

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Laura TaylorWatton

    Because of the nature of our political system with its short term target driven mindset, we change what happens in education only superficially. Usually so it can be measured with in the life time of a government. Endlessly jiggle the system and call it reform… I think we have to go back to the child. Back to basics and I do not mean the 3 R`s, although they are important of course. I mean something very different. At the heart of every child, newborn is a unique genius and personality. What we SHOULD be doing is to allow the spark of that genius to catch fire, burn brightly and shine. What we seem to be doing with so many of our children is to corral them stifle them and construct a world where success and failure is all that counts. A fear of failure is what does the most damage. Back to stories again, to Dickens, to Mr Gradgrind and hard times, whose notion of education was to ram facts down children’s throats. We may not beat children anymore, and that’s progress of course but at times I’m not sure how far we`ve moved on since Gradgrind or since I was at school myself in the 1950`s. We still have classes that are twice the size of what they should be; far too big for teachers to have those vital relationships with children that are so important particularly those children who are already disengaged and alienated… And we still have a society where although some schools are wonderfully successful others remain mired in poverty and failure in a situation that continues to wreck the lives of so many of our children and exacerbate the divisions in our national life. It is those schools and those children we are not reaching and rights we are denying. As Michael Gove, The education secretary has recently said; and he is right about some things [...] We must remember that we are preparing children, not simply for employment although that is important, nor for the contribution they can make to the common good [..] But for the difficult decisions they will have to make in their personal lives, those moments where they have to take responsibility for themselves and for others. When they decide whether or not to have sex with someone new, tempted in to drugs, carrying a knife, throw a brick through a window, in those critical moments the decisions they make the choices they make rely so much on the relationships they have when they`re young, with their parents, with their teachers and on their self worth and self confidence. There is no league table for relationships [..]

    Report abuse

Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

LIVE traffic updates

Road, rail and airport - latest Road, rail and airport - latest

Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.