New rules on Motability are needed to make it fairer

Monday 31st October 2011, 4:34PM GMT.

New rules on Motability are needed to make it fairer

This month the Queen handed over keys to the three millionth Motability car in a ceremony at the House of Commons, just as new rules are drawn up in a bid to crack down on fraudulent use of the scheme, writes blogger Emma Suddaby.

It is a complex problem, because at its heart Motability is a brilliant scheme which offers those with serious disability the gift of mobility.

For those who would otherwise be virtually housebound, having access to a suitable car can be absolutely life-changing and I don’t think my own life would be half as good as it is now, had I not had a Motability car in the early years of my illness.

But when the scheme was launched in 1978, it was a very different animal to what we have today; I wonder if Her Maj would be smiling so broadly if she knew she may be handing over keys to a £35,000 BMW X3, obtained through Motability, for a driver “disabled” by a long-term alcohol addiction?

Whatever next – maybe we should be paying for a chauffeur too so the poor love doesn’t go drink-driving!

At least rules are finally starting to catch up, with the maximum cost of cars available to claimants to be slashed to £25,000. Previously, applicants could spend up to £9,000 trading up to a high-performance car.

That’s all good news, but I’ll bet many Shropshire Star readers will be horrified to learn this sort of scam was ever possible in the first place.

Because it means our hard-earned taxes are paying for a lucky few to drive around in the sort of cars we can only dream of owning.

Regular readers will be used to me banging on about the Motability scheme – because so many genuinely disabled people are being left out in the cold for one bureaucratic reason or another.

It’s not the first time I’ve warned of unsustainable and unfair protocols and, lo and behold, here we are again. Same old silage, different day.

If I had my way, I would take a leaf out of the pages of history. Instead of offering claimants their pick of cars on the market, I’d offer just two versions of the same car. It would be a basic model, an everyday run-around with one type suitable for those who can walk with limited mobility, and another suitable for those driving from a wheelchair.

It would not be smart, it would not be clever, and though we needn’t go as far as the original blue, three wheeled trike car, it would not be sporty or expensive enough to tempt fraudsters.

Truly disabled claimants don’t care what it looks like, as long as it gets them there, so I dare Motability to go further – issue a basic car only and watch as those with more, shall we say “disputable disabilities” miraculously find alternative transport.


  1. 1
    Mr Grumpy

    Well, certainly our elderly neighbours have a massive, shiny black 4 x 4 acquired on the Motability scheme, far larger than is really necessary (though you could dispute that the lady in question has difficulty in lowering herself down into a normal car seat).

    But why such a high powered vehicle, you might ask? In Telford, the opportunites for off-roading are few and far between, even if we are surrounded by rural areas. Rumbling up the Wrekin at high speed is not the most sought-after hobby for the elderly and infirmed, is it?

    I’ll also presume that the Motability scheme were completely unaware of her husbands equally spacious & powerful saloon car, also sporting a nice little blue badge. It must be nice to have the choice…

    Like a lot of things in life, some people know how to work the system, some people let the system do the work for them. And those are the systems that are need of dire change.

    Of course, if I ever get to the point where I’ll need the help of Motability, I imagine it either won’t be around or they’ll offer me an old tiny banger…

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Warkman

    Yet again, very poor journalism, from the Dail Mail school.
    The cost of the Motability scheme per diabled user will NOT be effected by the unreasonable cap now put on tyhe cars available. The whole point of the Advanced payment is that it is the Disabled drivers on cost for having a less basic acr!
    This is NOT a cost on the taxpayer and has no effect on the money paid out to Motability!
    Dont forget Motability as a charity does not pay VAT, becaiuse they lease in big amounts they get special prices from the manufactureres, so this emotive line of £35,000 cars is spurious and quiet frankly, bad journalism!
    Also dont forget, unlike normal lease schemes, any money paid by the driver in AP is lost, its not paid back to the driver. If a disabled person wnats to spend some of their own hard earnbed cash on a better spec acr why should they be stopped? Many of us have worked solidly for 35 years or maore, paying taxes and yet this stupid jealousy rears its ugle head.
    Those of us who need an automatic are doubliy penalised ny these new cahnges, as always auto boxes cost more and have a greater AP than manual cars. We now have a much smaller choice and of a lower spec than manual drivers because of this knee jerk reaction by the gutter press.
    of course some peopeol abuse the systen, rather like ablked bodies people taking up disabled spaces because they can’t be bothere to walk, but this change penalises the majority for the few who shoukld be rooted out and removed from the scheme.
    Please Shropshire Star, do some investugatice work and get the facts, not repring the daily mails lies, which they ahve had to retract.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    paul

    Totally agree with your comments that drivers of Automatics will fare very badly under the new regulations. I think Motability need to think about a higher AP, say 2500 or even more more for Automatics or allow applicants to pay the extra cost (the cost to Motability, not the RRP) of an auto box. Now there are just 300 automatics available and over 40% are small cars. Bear in mind that of the other 180 in some cases 1 car may have over 15 variants, so a poor choice unless we see more cars in Jan.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Dennis

    i have just read all that has been printted on this site ,and feel that the cases for no limit is correct my reasons are there is no extra cost to anyone APART from the disabled person buying the car and then giving it back and start again ,so WHY has anybody got anything to say about this situation other than the person who is selling the car and the one buying the car , are we the disabled not aloud to drive nice cars (even expencive cars) or like most people these days like benifit fraud every body says disabled people are the scum of the earth because they claim benifits ….were costing the workin people of this country this or that amount ,i have worked all my life and paid into into a system that if somehting happens to me i will be helped to LIVE a normal life and when it comes to that time like many others the public and the govenment try to stop not only me but every one who claims a benifit and just as important the people who are moaning have probaly paid into a system like myself and when they have a problem and THEY will there wont be any help there because the govenment and those who moan like those who moaned about thee above i rest my case . ONE DAY I COULD BE YOU ,disabled !!!!!!!

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    fiona Taylor

    Where do these idiots get their facts from. We have a motability car for our son who is registered partially sighted, has brittle bones and regularly stops breathing he has numerous bits of equipment that we have to take out with us ie, feeding chair (so he doesnt choke whilst eating), a walking frame so he can walk a few steps if we go out, a toilet seat as he is not capable of sitting safely on a normal toilet and finally his wheel chair. Perhaps whoever wrote this twaddle would like to explain how we get all this equipment into the cars they are proposing.
    Also on a final note, we paid a deposit of £6000 to have a car with a large enough boot space to fit everything in which when the car is handed back we will never see again unless we buy the car.
    I would rather have a healthy son and no dla than what he has to suffer every day.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.