Blog: Save our countryside from the march of the pylons

Tuesday 19th July 2011, 10:12AM BST.

Blog: Save our countryside from the march of the pylons

Blog: Last time I wrote about the great pylon debate I said I needed time to decide which side of the fence to be on and, as promised, I’ve spent many hours since researching the seemingly murky roots of the so-called ‘low-carbon revolution’.

As I’ve mentioned before, I’ve had my own run-ins with the NIMBYs of this world and bandwagons are not something I often hitch a ride on, so I had to find out for my own peace of mind whether wind farms are something we should be protesting about.

After all, according to Labour leader Ed Miliband, opposing wind farms should become as socially unacceptable as failing to wear a seat belt.

So having spent many, pretty mind-numbing hours reading up about renewable energy targets and the many sticky fingers in EU funding pies, I’ve finally come to my own conclusions: people, let’s protest!

Peter Davies, Doncaster’s publicly elected and much talked about “no-nonsense” mayor, made his feelings clear on the subject.

“These [wind farm] developments have little or no benefit in terms of contributing to decreased energy consumption, nor do they have any beneficial effect on the planet’s climate in response to the great global warming scam,” he said.

So who do we trust? Ed Miliband, the climate change cabinet minister up to his eyes with the EU and their renewable energy funds and quotas and grants, or Peter Davies, the no-nonsense Mayor who, after sweeping unexpectedly to power, made it his first job to slash his own salary from £73,000 to £30,000 per year and then immediately gave up the use of his chauffeur-driven car (after finding the chauffeur a new job).

And the more I investigate, the more the truths of global warming are seemingly obscured by the intricate web of grants and funds and targets and EU involvement, until it seems to me an economic issue rather than an ecological one.

It has been estimated that 180,000 jobs will be created in the UK by the renewable energy movement by 2012, and while that in itself is laudable, should it really be at the cost of our health, happiness and incredibly valuable natural environment?

And if an emerging global warming industry is really at the heart of all this political interest, why can’t we just be honest and up-front about it and stop pretending it’s all about the planet, man?

Because it seems politicians are so busy racing to reach renewable energy targets set by the EU in order to get their sticky mitts on the huge grants available, nobody seems all that interested in how much energy the wind turbines will actually create, or whether the rape and pillage of our most valuable asset – our beautiful countryside – will really be worth it in the end.


  1. 1
    Ed

    The title of the article is misleading. New lines of pylons may be needed whatever new type of energy you put in place.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Jon

    I don’t think the Mayor of Doncaster is the best person to go to for advice about climate change – perhaps the climate scientists might be better?

    Perhaps read this opinion piece, from soneone who is already dealing with effects of climate change, and see if you come to the same conclusion. Puts into perspective having the view of some sheep interrupted. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/opinion/19stephen.html?_r=2&ref=opinion

    Report abuse

    • Pete

      I have read the piece but I seem to recall that a very respected newspaper carried an article that suggested that many Pacific islands were sinking as a result of the shifting tectonic plates. NOT global warming.

      The “Anxiety Industry” is still a flourishing business.

      There is a wealth of information on the net from countries like Denmark which has found building hundreds of windfactories has not produced the promised results.
      It is a developing mystery that the Con-Libs and the Welsh Assembly still have not done their homework and realised that massively-subsidised windfactories will cost consumers huge sums but produce pitiful amounts of irregular electricity.

      Report abuse

  3. 3
    winja

    Emma, fair play for taking the time out to actually do a little investigative work on the impact windmills have on reducing Team GB’s carbon footprint, and their associated effectiveness on introducing electricity – reliably – into supply.

    The answer to both, of course, is negligible

    CO2 concentration is currently 380ppv (parts per million volume) i.e. 0.03% of the total volume of the Earth’s atmosphere. Of that 0.03%, maybe 10% is man made. So 0.003% is down to us as a race, of which maybe 2% is created by this country.

    So.

    These windmills are the supposed answer to the question of “How can we reduce this country’s 0.00006% contribution to the concentration of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere?”.

    Puts into perspective having the countryside despoiled by turbines that are wholly un-called for and hopelessly ineffective.

    Not to mention the vicarious effects on the nations that produce the raw materials for the bloody things:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-clean-green-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.