Blog: Digital switchover a success or a big turn-off?
Monday 11th April 2011, 6:00AM BST.
Blog: Local residents have been awaiting the big event with baited breath, wondering if it will all live up to the hype.
The much-publicised joining together of something the British public hold dear, the old traditions making way for the new breed.
No, not the Royal Wedding – the digital switchover!
Because, let’s face it, no matter how much publicity is thrown at Wills’ and Kate’s Big Day – no matter how often we’re reminded that we should all be throwing street parties and getting together as a community to mark their special day – frankly we’re all far too broke and much more interested in the cheap entertainment our trusty TVs provide us with night after night.
In these dark days of wallet-squeezing cutbacks, redundancies and slashed benefits, television is king, bringing us the cheap night in instead of the expensive night out.
But now they’re shaking it all up with the digital switchover. Thanks for that.
Because I know it will all be much better in the end, with more channels and better reception and all that guff, but we all know nothing in technology ever goes that smoothly . . . and getting there could be painful.
After the massive advertising campaign, we should all be aware by now of the steps we should have taken to be ready for the switchover. And now that some parts of the county have already been partially switched on, did it all go as planned? A smooth transition into the digital wonders of 21st century TV?
Not exactly…
Now we have people all over the Wrekin wondering where BBC went after the first-phase switchover last Wednesday…
Living out in the Powys hills, where analogue TV has no chance, I made the switch to digital some time ago. So having spent many long evenings flicking through the endless channels trying to find something I, a) want to watch, that, b) I haven’t already seen, and that, c) isn’t ruined by the scrambling and burping of bad reception, I know the reality is far from living up to the promises of digital wonder.
Whatever happened to extensive channel choice and improved reception? And what are we actually going to get in return for having to cough up for a digital TV service, on top of the existing licence fee?
With credit-crunching cuts to programming and some smaller local radio stations facing the axe, it feels like we’ve yet again been hoodwinked into paying more money for less service. Mind you, it’s a good way to ensure that we all gather together to enjoy the Royal Wedding – never mind the street parties, we’ll all be round the neighbour’s house, gathered around the one television in the street that actually works.
And in case you miss it, the one thing you can now be sure of is that it will be repeated… again… and again… and again…
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
There must be riots in the Hills of Powys.
Get a better nigh gain antenna, retune job done, or wright to the Welsh assembly and ask them to improve the welsh transmitters.
Report abuse
So you had a lousy analogue signal,and switched to digital. Now, when we have changes to a) allow more people access to those services and b) improve the signal strength for those who already receive it.
The changes have been well-publicised, well-advertised, and it’s a very simple matter to retune the equipment – yet still you complain.
Some people really are never happy…
Report abuse
Hype? I must have blinked and missed it
Report abuse
yawn
Report abuse
Slow news day so let the ill informed so called journalist, who chooses to live in the A$%e end of nowhere, loose on a subject she knows nothing about eh?
Report abuse
In all fairness, she a so called blogger, not a so called journalist, where she lives is irrelevant and writing about something without much information is a staple of columnists everywhere.
Report abuse
That’s a rather innenundo filled picture of Christine Bleakley.
Report abuse
The only thing that is repeated again, and again, and again is Emma’s own ill informed ramblings. Yawn. Give me a pixellated, repeat of ‘Carry on Doctor’ any day instead of this nonsense.
Report abuse
Still not forgotten this one complaining about someone she rear ended…
At least while you are at home watching the telly love you aren’t endangering innocent road users… :)
Report abuse
I can guarantee you will be paying more money for less service – that’s the way of big business.
Report abuse
If you find TV so boring, why bore us by writing a blog about it?
Why not spend your evenings doing something you enjoy instead?
Report abuse
I sympathise with Ms Suddaby. For many in the county, the Great British digital switchover is much ado about nothing. Here in Ludlow where for many, broadcast TV is received from the Ludlow relay, rather than from a satellite broadcast, the lineup on digital channels is pathetic.
The Ludlow relay (not a main transmitter) has just two multiplexes. By contrast, the Wrekin transmitter has six multiplexes. Each multiplex broadcasts a datastream of 24Mbps to can carry 10 channels. But with just two multiplexes, the choice of channels in Ludlow is consequently very limited.
Now we’ve all gone digital, we get the usual suspects from BBC, that is BBC1 and BBC2. In addition, and broadcast especially for the insomniac, we now get BBC Parliament and BBC News, and after 7pm there are the equally boring BBC3 and BBC4. Yawn, indeed. And for the brats wagging school, there are now three dedicated BBC childrens channels just for them, up until 7pm when the frequencies hand over to BBC3 and BBC4.
The commercial channels are what one would expect: ITV1, C4 and Five, and a couple of “new” ITV channels which broadcast endless repeats from ITV1, and do so at an hour’s delay.
It’s a great disappointment.
Another issue with digital TV is that it does not “degrade gracefully”.
In bad weather, the old analogue signal was snowy but still watchable, and the audio quality was scarcely affected by atmospherics.
Digital terrestrial TV (DVB-T), however, is another story. The MPEG compression system is uses means that where there is signal noise it can destroy numerous video frames, and the audio signal is sometimes lost for many seconds at a time. That never happened with analogue TV.
We might wonder why the Government was so keen to thrust digital TV on us. Unsurprisingly, the answer is all about money. HMG plans to auction off the UHF sub-bands previously used by analogue TV to the mobile phone operators. They intend to launch mobile video phone services using those frequencies. So the digital switchover was all about money, government revenues, and mobile phones. How exciting!
Report abuse
I blame the gritters, Tories, cyclists, council…..etc.
Sorry, i didn’t even bother to read this one.
Report abuse