Blog: Not a happy time for Shropshire’s hospitals

Friday 28th January 2011, 12:48PM GMT.

Blog: Not a happy time for Shropshire’s hospitals

Blog: These are not happy times for the bosses of the trust which runs the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital and Telford’s Princess Royal, writes health correspondent Dave Morris.

They are currently facing a strong, and growing, protest over proposals to move women and children’s services from Shrewsbury to Telford.

And now the trust has been struck by what chief executive Adam Cairns describes as the “perfect financial storm” which is costing it millions of pounds.

It has been created by a big rise in emergency admissions – far above the numbers the trust had contracted for with its service “paymasters”, the primary care trusts.

For every patient it treats above its contract level, the hospital trust gets paid only 30 per cent the cost.

What a crazy state of affairs.

On this occasion, my sympathy lies with the trust.

What is it supposed to do when far more patients than it expected are referred to the two hospitals as emergencies? Close the doors?

And when far more people are being brought by ambulance to the A&E units than had been planned for in the contract, what is it supposed to do? Turn the ambulances back?

The “perfect storm” is also whipped up by the fact that a big rise in emergencies results in bed shortages, and routine operations have to be cancelled, which costs even more money.

And on top of all this trust has run up a “big bill” in staff costs as a result of all the extra work.

Mr Cairns is looking forward to having a “constructive dialogue” with colleagues at the primary care trusts.

I for one wish him well.

But why are patient numbers so high?

It’s a fact that the Shrewsbury and Telford hospitals have come through an extremely busy time, dealing with flu cases and other winter illnesses.

But the pressure on services always appears to be high.

Have people’s expectations risen? Are they more demanding? Does the problem stem from an ageing population? Are GPs “playing safe” in this compensation-seeking age and referring more patients to hospital?

I really don’t know.

And yet I frequently attend meetings, both council and NHS, at which “preventative” initiatives, aimed at cutting hospital admissions, are discussed and approved.

In the meantime the “perfect financial storm” shows no signs of calming.


  1. 1
    adam

    Why are numbers so high?

    Victims of our own success – dead people never come back. Survivors can return many times.

    Lower than normal levels of ‘flu for 10 years – with resources stripped away, so the pressures of a normal winter become a challenge

    Larger numbers of older people, with smaller numbers of children to care for them – and even smaller numbers willing and able to do so.

    Higher demand – the days when those over eighty were kept away from hospital and allowed to decline are long gone

    Public misuse – the number of people attending ‘Accident and Emergency’ with neither is startling – and some get admitted to meet the ‘treated in 4 hours’ target, whether they needed it or not

    And then there is the last government’s reform (many would say destruction) of medical training in systems, which may mean many more get treated but far fewer get sorted.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    jeff

    so it’s costing the trust money as they are treating more than they had contracted for, if we had a real mild winter and not people used A&E would the hospital have to pay back the difference or would they still get the same money?

    could we not go back to when hospitals were run by people who knew what they were doing not by about 4 or 5 levels of managment over and above the medical staff

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Bill

    Part of the issue is the accessibility of GPs.

    Most surgeries now run strict appointment or ‘call on the day’ systems opening at 8.30 a.m. so a person who decides after 9.00 a.m. right through to the following morning that they do need medical attention for a flu, severe cold or bronchial problem triggered by the weather sees their best option to be to go to A&E.

    The new GP surgery at the PRH with its extended hours is certainly helping, but perhaps the triage system at the hospitals needs to be stricter – or they have a GP on duty, not involved with the ‘hard’ A&E work, who can turn these patients round in ten minutes rather than have them cluttering a waiting room for four hours.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Rupert Barrington-Black

    actually it doesn’t cost the hospital any more.

    The economics is straight forward.

    To cover the staff, building admin and other yearly running cost a hospital needs to treat x patients.

    Thus if a hospital had yearly running costs of £100,000 and anticipated 1,000 patients per year the cost per patient is £100.

    Once the agreed number have been treated, all running costs have been paid for.

    The 101st patient does not cost £100. Cost now is for the drugs etc,

    What then needs to be covered is the medical cost of care. Hence the 30% figure.

    NHS Hospitals are not in business for a profit, a private hospital would continue to charge full rate, as that is how its profit is made.

    I can imagine if the full amount was paid, the story would be how hospitals are ripping off and charging PCT’s etc.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.