Blog: Graduating with a £30,000 debt is obscene
Tuesday 12th October 2010, 10:02AM BST.
Blog: Put a note in your diary against today’s date.
Because today, the United Kingdon finally lost its way altogether.
Lord Browne’s plan to open up the University sector to free market economics says one thing only about the state of modern Britain: We know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
The former boss of BP says universities should be able to charge students what they want for their education, though they will face charges when their annual fees top £6,000, and that competition will drive up standards. Graduates won’t start paying back their fees until they are earning at least £21,000 and they will only be charged a basic rate of interest.
How reasonable.
Or at least that’s what the good lord would have you believe.
But that’s before you consider the obscenity of every graduate leaving university saddled with £30,000 of debt.
Or the simple indecency of university becoming once again a privilege reserved for the wealthy — because ordinary hard-working families simply cannot afford to bankroll this level of debt.
Or worse still, the assumption which underlies Lord Browne’s whole report that the only purpose of university is to turn out high-flying graduates who will earn big money. There’s no thought that university has a social element, that it teaches our youngsters independence, self-esteem, self-worth and the like. That it introduces them to a wider community, broadens their horizons and helps them develop into more rounded people.
No. In Lord Browne’s world students go to university simply because they are greedy and want to earn as much as possible for themselves in the future. It is the bleakest view of humanity imaginable.
The coalition will say they cannot afford to keep funding unlimited numbers of students because of the legacy of debt left by the last Labour Government.
So their answer is to saddle our brightest and best youngsters with a mountain of debt all of their own.
It is the politics of the madhouse. Let’s solve debt by creating more debt.
But it also smacks of political opportunism, though that will perhaps only become more clear when Mr Cameron, Mr Osborne and the rest of the multi-millionaires currently running the country have to explain why they can still afford to send their children to university but you and I cannot.
By Jon Simcock
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
here’s an idea for you:
make all medical, scientific, engineering, economics and teaching degrees free.
then charge what you like for modern dance, photography, womens (or mens) studies, and the simpsons.
If you want to do a degree to make somethign of your life then we will pay. if it is a vanity subject as so many now are then pay for it yourself.
Problem solved.
Report abuse
Quite like Andy’s idea. Make it cheaper to do a degree that will be of more value to the nation.
Another solution would be to stop the “every child must attend university” policy. Why do we all have to have a degree? There were plenty of people on my degree course who would have gained as much if not more practical knowledge had they gone into employment rather than spend three years drinking and sitting in the occasional lecture.
Pricing people out of education may cut the numbers, but there have to be better ways.
Report abuse
In a country that needs engineers, builders, care workers, electricians, nurses, etc., we send people on vague humanities degrees. How very sensible.
Report abuse
If this country is going to be able to compete with other nations we must have a workforce that is their equal. I therefore wholeheartedly agree with a proposal that will ensure the lower orders cannot afford to go to university. Finally then we will reach the utopia of having two classes (rather than all that upper/upper-middle/middle/middle lower etc nonsense, which just confuses me, but at least keeps them fighting between themselves rather than turning on the likes of me). The new classes shall be The Decadent Classes (ahem, myself) and you horrible oik-ish shower, I shall call you ‘The sweat-shop caste’.
Oh, then it will be a hurrah for Great Britain again ! No more off-shoring jobs (it’ll be cheaper to employ you lot), no more immigrants (they won’t want to come here)…we’ll *all* be happy (especially me)!
Note to self; Build large electrified perimeter fencing.
Report abuse
Very good suggestion from first person how ever it should not be free why should it?.
Many People go to uni to study a subject they have and interest in, many of the degrees got by these people will however not get them a job hence the high level of graduates we have on benefits. Little if any funding should be given for these not even the loans.
You can do a degree while in full time employment through other avenues just takes a little longer and yep it can be hard work combining the two but many do it year in year out.
The benefit of what I suggest NO DEBT and NO sponging of the bank of mum and dad , or the tax payer as you lounge around on benefits, and no driving your work associates mad with “I shouldn’t have to do this I’ve got a degree ” or worse still, taking the life long learning to its extreme and still be in education at 40+ with never having held down a full time job, and we have quite a few of those around.
Report abuse