Confusion over comparison sites

Confusion over comparison sitesRelying on one comparison site for your insurance may not get you the best deal, according to research.

Consumer finance magazine Which? Money checked the three largest price comparison sites – Moneysupermarket.com, Gocompare.com and Confused.com and found the cheapest quote was different on each website.

The cheapest home contents policy varied from £51 on Gocompare.com to £71 on Confused.com, while the cheapest standard-rate credit card varied from 6.8 per cent APR on Moneysupermarket.com to 12.9 per cent APR on Gocompare.com.

In some cases, the quotes were cheaper on the insurer’s own website, Which? found.

Martyn Hocking, Which? Money editor, said: “With such an array of financial products to choose from, it can be tempting to turn to a price comparison site to do the legwork for you.

“But you might be very confused to find that different sites can give you vastly different quotes and often don’t give enough information for you to make an informed choice.

“You need to use two or three comparison sites and check directly with providers to get the best quote, and remember that cheapest isn’t always best – it’s a false economy if you don’t get enough cover for your needs or have to pay a huge excess if you claim.”

Which? Money also finds a true comparison was difficult as each website asked different questions and showed different product features. In some cases it was necessary to visit insurers’ own websites to check details such as the excess that people would need to pay if they made an insurance claim.

Have your say on  'Confusion over comparison sites', comment below

Transforming Telford
Greenhous SAAB
MRC Recruitment
Shropshire Magazine (468)

Post a Comment

*
*

* Required fields. Your email is never published or shared.

Disclaimer: We will put up as many of your responses as possible but cannot guarantee that all comments will be published. We prefer short comments that include no external website links. We reserve the right to edit comments and will not enter into correspondence over editing decisions. Comments featured on the site are not representative of the views of the Shropshire Star or Midland News Association.