Severn Trent will face fine of £35m

tap-drips.jpgWater regulator Ofwat today confirmed it was fining Shropshire’s water supplier Severn Trent a total of £35.8 million for deliberately providing false information and poor customer service.It comes just a day after the company was ordered to pay a further £2 million by a judge at the Old Bailey for lying about water leakage figures. The regulator’s £35.8 million fine was proposed in April, and formally confirmed today after three months of consultation.

Ofwat chief executive Regina Finn said: “Severn Trent Water’s behaviour was unacceptable. The size of the fine reflects how seriously Ofwat takes the deliberate misreporting of information.

“This sends a clear message to the company and to the rest of the water sector - Ofwat will protect consumers and companies must comply with their legal obligations or pay the price.”

Severn Trent bosses were today coming to terms with the double financial blow - which the regulator insists must be borne by shareholders, and not passed on to the company’s eight million customers.

The Serious Fraud Office, which prosecuted yesterday’s leakage figures case, had hoped for a fine in the region of £70 million to add to Ofwat’s £35.8 million charge.

But Judge Jeremy Roberts, who handed out the £2 million fine, said he had to compare the case to Metropolitan Police’s £175,000 fine for the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes, and £4 million against Network Rail following the Paddington train crash.

The court was told Severn Trent reported an estimated yearly water loss of 340 million litres per day to meet targets, while the true figure was about 514 million litres. This was to stave off having to carry out millions of pounds-worth of repairs until they could be covered by future water bills, and to avoid bad publicity.

The investigation into Severn Trent’s leakage figures was sparked by Shropshire “whistleblower” David Donnelly, from Chelmarsh, near Bridgnorth, who worked in the company’s finance department.

Mr Donnelly claimed the company was falsifying figures to overcharge customers in 2004.

Tony Wray, the current chief executive, said Severn Trent “deeply regretted” its mistakes and had apologised to customers.

He said the guilty parties had since left the company, and added: “There were indefensible shortcomings in Severn Trent’s previous management and control systems during the 2000 to 2004 era.”

But Brian Duckworth, who was managing director during that time and one of three senior executives named by the Serious Fraud Office in the leakage reporting investigation, criticised the handling of the case, saying he had been denied the chance to put his side of the story.

“I am deeply saddened that after a career of 30 years devoted to the water industry, mistakes have been laid at my door without affording me the opportunity of a defence,” he said.

By Carl Jones

Have your say on  'Severn Trent will face fine of £35m', comment below

Transforming Telford
Greenhous SAAB
MRC Recruitment
Shropshire Magazine (468)

9 Comments

  1. Devilschair said:

    That’s all very well - but what guarantees do we have they will not just pass the fines onto the customer.

    Shropshire Star - please send a journalist to ask that question please!

  2. Bluejay said:

    Thats our water bills going up again then

  3. BRIAN(2) said:

    It’s funny how they can be fined for overcharging and yet still put the cost up the next year. Any other business couldn’t get away with it.

  4. amh@griffithsfarms.c said:

    Will this stop them from sending out new invoices to companies, cancelling previous invoices for meters which have already been read 3 or 4 years ago? It would be nice to send them a bill for all the time I have wasted checking out these cancellations, all the more irritating because we have more than one account.

  5. let me have my say said:

    Hope customers get to get some money off their bills, or will it just goes back to te government to waste it.

  6. askeric dotcom said:

    What an absolute disgrace all this is.

    “The supply and procesing of a fundamental, natural resource essential to life being left in private hands”.

    It seems to me irrelevant how much they were fined. There should never have been an opportunity, nor a reason to, cheat in the first place.

    As a business owner, I don’t neccessarily believe in wholly private ownership of certain areas, particularly untilities.

    Water is such a fundamental resource that it should not be left to the greed of business owners, controllers and shareholders.

    The whole thing is such a disgrace - and UK water supply should be placed in public ownership immediately.

  7. john said:

    Brian Duckworth“I am deeply saddened that after a career of 30 years devoted to the water industry, mistakes have been laid at my door without affording me the opportunity of a defence,” he said.
    How can you defend lying about the size of leakage?Accouns don’t lie.

  8. danny peer said:

    why do the government get the fine?? Shouldnt us customers who got ripped off when maggie privatised water and then ripped off every month since when severn trent sell us our water get some of the money atleast?

  9. danny peer said:

    they are evil in the private sector

    clean water should be beyond profit

    IT IS A HUMAN RIGHT

Post a Comment

*
*

* Required fields. Your email is never published or shared.

Disclaimer: We will put up as many of your responses as possible but cannot guarantee that all comments will be published. We prefer short comments that include no external website links. We reserve the right to edit comments and will not enter into correspondence over editing decisions. Comments featured on the site are not representative of the views of the Shropshire Star or Midland News Association.