Council in bid to save 28 POs

post-office-closure.jpgHard-hitting questions are to be put to Post Office bosses in a bid by Shirehall watchdogs to find out the reasons why the company has targeted 28 branches across Shropshire for the axe.

A county council report into the planned closures has led to Post Office Ltd being accused of discrimination, with a warning that many of its proposed alternative services are neither practical or realistic.

Members of a council scrutiny panel will be seeking answers to the questions so that the authority can make its formal response to the closures move.

It has “many concerns” about the proposals, says the 56-page report, and it is imperative that clearer information is forthcoming from Post Office Ltd.

South Shropshire, for example, has borne the brunt of the proposed closures but given that the county council does not have access to information from all of the county’s post offices, there is no way it can fully understand how the proposals will result in a more acceptable network.

The report warns that preventing post offices earmarked for closure from finding alternative ways of delivering services for 12 months, discriminates against remote rural communities.

“We are also concerned that this places unfair limitations on the village shops which are losing their post office and which we are particularly keen to support,” it adds. “This intention was not made clear during the national consultation.”

Looking at the threat to the Shrewsbury post offices at Greenfields and Ditherington, the report says there is no evidence of how the large number of proposed new houses was taken into consideration.

In the case of Ditherington, the suggested alternative at Sentinel Gardens will not have the capacity to handle the addition business, it says.

It also highlights the case of Lydbury North, where the nearest alternative to its closure-threatened post office is more than three miles away and there is no bus service between them.

The report is being presented to the county council’s economy and environment scrutiny panel on Tuesday to which senior Post Office officials have been invited.

By Dave Morris

Have your say on  'Council in bid to save 28 POs', comment below

Alan Ward (2)
William A. Lewis
Earlyworld
Dating v2 - Prince

6 Comments

  1. Devilschair said:

    The Star reported a while back about Councils taking over Post Offices. Whatever happened to that?

  2. Mike said:

    I ADMIRE YOUR GUTS GUY’S, BUT, AS WITH OTHER MOST RECENT MATTERS IN SHROPSHIRE, I CAN NOT HELP BUT FEEL THAT ANY PROTESTS MADE WILL FALL ON DEAF EARS.
    IT SEEMS THAT ONCE A DECISION HAS BEEN MADE, NOTHING BUT NOTHING WILL CHANGE MATTERS. I SINCERELY HOPE THAT I AM PROVED WRONG.

  3. Matt said:

    SCC Says:

    “We must close down these rural Post Offices!”

    Oh, no! Sorry! SCC says: “We must close down our rural schools but the Post Office must not close any rural Post Offices.”

    Makes perfect sense.

  4. devon salopian said:

    not so sure about the decisions already being made allegedly these closures are proposals for discussion. devon county council is conducting a similar exercise with those threatened down here
    if all the banks would allow banking through the post offices, many would not need to close. well done those like barclays and lloyds tsb who do allow banking through the po’s

  5. Peter said:

    Quite how communities are supposed to respond with a meaningful arguement as to why their local PO should not close when Post Office Ltd will not tell them the full criteria they base their decisions on is beyond me. The 6 week consultation is a complete sham.

  6. Ronald Berry said:

    Close rural post offices, but spend thousands on advertising the infantile ‘Peoples Post Offices’ on prime TV. Is it any surprise the Post Office is losing money - it is being run by a bunch of idiots, who could not run a Christmas Club!!!

Post a Comment

*
*

* Required fields. Your email is never published or shared.

Disclaimer: We will put up as many of your responses as possible but cannot guarantee that all comments will be published. We prefer short comments that include no external website links. We reserve the right to edit comments and will not enter into correspondence over editing decisions. Comments featured on the site are not representative of the views of the Shropshire Star or Midland News Association.