Couple’s fears over school

sos12.jpgA couple who are helping to bring up their young grandson after the death of both of his parents in road accidents are now fighting to keep his school at Maesbury, near Oswestry, open.

Mo Edwards and husband John are in their late sixties and have lived in Maesbury Marsh for 37 years. They are worried about the impact closure would have.

“We are particularly concerned about the closure of all rural schools as these are the heart of the small isolated communities throughout sparsely populated Shropshire,” said Mrs Edwards.

“Of course, our particular worry is the closure of Maesbury Primary school which our grandson attends, who has special needs.

“He lives with us due to tragic circumstances: the death of his mother and father some five years ago, so this puts us clearly back into the education spectrum and intent on getting the best for our grandson, and of all children being educated at these small schools.”

Mrs Edwards said Maesbury school was always working to full capacity and had an excellent Ofsted report.

There was a waiting list to for places. She added: “None of the children leave Maesbury not being able to read.

“Incidentally, Maesbury has just opened a new Post Office, against all national trends, and now the school is under threat.”

She has several points which she is urging Ann Hartley, county council cabinet member for children’s services, and the authority, to consider.

“Why are they making these proposals, when the main issue is to get the appropriate funding for Shropshire children?” asked Mrs Edwards.

“When you look at the percentages of children attending these schools who are ‘out of area’, one has got to ask why are parents taking their children to these smaller schools?

“Why should the primary schools who are full to their capacity lose out to the larger primaries who are clearly not attracting their full quota for their available spaces?”

Mrs Edwards added: “It is totally wrong to let a Conservative controlled council have the ultimate decision to take these proposals forward.

“It should be the decision of all councils and of all parties.

“‘No child will have to travel more than six miles’. How does this fit in with the Government strategy of walking children to school to prevent carbon footprints?

“How is Shropshire going to maintain, or in fact attract, teaching staff when schools are under threat of closure?” she asked.

“No one will want to teach in Shropshire, the remaining schools will also go into a decline.”

5 Comments

  1. Chris P Bacon said:

    Honestly! Is this truly the best story that can be gleaned from the school closure programme? Worried grandparents?

    Accept it, let the schools close so that funding can be distributed more fairly, and move on.

    Report abuse

  2. Joan said:

    The number of children in Shropshire is dropping dramatically. This is what is behind the proposed closure of small schools. There are going to be hundreds of spare school places unless something is done. Otherwise, those paying council tax will be subsidising schools which are costing a fortune to sustain because of their very small numbers.

    Report abuse

  3. tony russell from devon said:

    i am sorry chris you are wrong most of these schools should be kept open. it follows that pupil numbers will be less than in towns and probably standards and school test results are higher in rural areas. the more i hear about school closures and it is not just shropshire, as herefordshire, powys, gwynedd devon and cornwall councils are or will be making similar decisions, the more i believe there is a new labour agenda behind this.
    their thinking might just be let’s starve the rural counties of cash so that small rural schools may be closed. if this is the agenda then i fear this government have reached a high water mark and the tide is going out in a big way for the government. it could be that gordon brown will share jim callaghans record. 2 prime ministers never to have won an election. wake up new labour you and the county councils are in danger of ruining village life for ever.

    Report abuse

  4. Matt said:

    Chris seems to forget the human scale of the problems these mega schools will cause.

    With such an ability to ignore the impact of council changes on ordinary people out in the real world (away from cosy little meetings in conference rooms at the oh-so-distant Shirehall) I wonder if Chris is a council officer or a councillor?

    Report abuse

  5. zoe said:

    I think they should be kept open as there are people that live in these rual areas without transport and without buses that run so how are they meant to get their children to school????

    Report abuse